Custom Search

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Meet Julia Fifield, 106 years old and still getting out to the voting poles.

  
Add to Google

Julia Fifield is 106 years old and still getting out to the voting poles, believed to be New Hampshire’s oldest voter, having cast ballots for 85 years. She is a great inspiration for all Americans and voters around the world. Orford, New Hampshire - January 10, 2012 Heading into the polls Tuesday is Orford, N.H.'s most experienced voter. At 106 years old, Julia Fifield is in a class of her own. "I'm voting for Romney. Believe me, I am. I'm a Republican through and through," she said. Fifield has been casting ballots since she was 21-- 85 years ago-- at the strong urging of her grandfather. "Not only urged me, he demanded that I get registered," she said. "And I have been voting ever since.

" A cane in the Orford town office honors Fifield as the town's oldest resident. And she is thought to be New Hampshire's oldest voter. Reporter Adam Sullivan: Some people would say when you hit 99, you have done your civic duty, but obviously you disagree? Julia Fifield: I completely disagree. "She comes to town meets and she partakes in it and she is really an example to follow," town moderator Peter Thomson said. And Thomson would know-- he's been town moderator for 42 years, beginning back in the Nixon era. But Fifield's presidential history goes back much further.

 She cast her very first vote for Calvin Coolidge. "And I voted for Coolidge, of course, because he was a fellow Vermonter. I was brought up in Vermont," Fifield said. History aside, this Granite Stater still has a lot of spunk. "Always a Republican but never a politician," she said. A young spirit that her daughter, Ann Davis, says her mom has always had. "Oh yes, you can ask anybody that knows her. She certainly has been," Davis said. "She should have told you the story-- she met President Taft when she was a little girl." That story is for another day. On this election day, Fifield offers advice to fellow voters: "Put your heart and soul into it and remember you are an American. And it is your duty." "We all love her and she is doing a great job and boy, 106, that is a good number," Thomson said. A good number for a great American-- still going strong.
Art in Bloom | 2009 Julia Fifield:
Accorded with being the first honorary member of the Hood Museum of Art due to her long association with and support of the museum, Julia Fifield agreed to be the honorary chair of the 2009 Art in Bloom at the Hood Museum of Art. Julia has extensive gardening expertise and is an active member of the Garden Club of America. Some of her outstanding contributions to the Garden Club of American include serving as the National Committee Chairmen of several committees between 1971-1979, receiving a Horticultural Achievement Certificate in 1960 and again in 1973. Julia became an elected Member at Large of the Garden Club of America in 1981, and in 1989 was awarded the prestigious Achievement Medal. Julia is also a past president and honorary member of the Garden Club of Buzzards Bay and an honorary member of the Hanover Garden Club.

Voting System: A voting system or electoral system is a method by which voters make a choice between options, often in an election or on a policy referendum. A voting system contains rules for valid voting, and how votes are counted and aggregated to yield a final result. Since voting involves counting, it is algorithmic in nature, and, since it involves polling the sentiments of a person, this represents affective data. Together, with the exception of proxy voting, this corresponds to in-degree centrality in graph theory and social network analysis, with votes as directed edges, and voters and candidates as nodes.[1] Common voting systems are majority rule, proportional representation or plurality voting with a number of variations and methods such as first-past-the-post or preferential voting. The study of formally defined voting systems is called voting theory, a subfield of political science, economics, or mathematics. With majority rule, those who are unfamiliar with voting theory are often surprised that another voting system exists, or that disagreements may exist over the definition of what it means to be supported by a majority[citation needed]. Depending on the meaning chosen, the common "majority rule" systems can produce results that the majority does not support. If every election had only two choices, the winner would be determined using majority rule alone. However, when there are three or more options, there may not be a single option that is most liked or most disliked by a majority. A simple choice does not allow voters to express the ordering or the intensity of their feeling. Different voting systems may give very different results, particularly in cases where there is no clear majority preference.