Tensions are once again mounting against Iran ahead of a crucial report by the UN nuclear watchdog, IAEA, due next week. Meanwhile, Israel has tested a new ballistic missile. Some reports go even further and suggest the idea of a military strike on the Islamic Republic is being pushed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. And British media say that with Iran remaining resilient against international sanctions, the attack could come as soon as next November. Various media cite the UK Ministry of Defense and Whitehall as their sources.
After yesterday's blog post
about the Israeli cabinet mulling military action against Iran, today,
it's the turn of the British military also apparently gearing up for a
strike. They're calling it "contingency planning" and it may very well
be. But it is a curious coincidence that preparations are occurring less
than a week before the much anticipated IAEA report on the Iranian nuke
program is published.
armed forces are stepping up their contingency planning for potential
military action against Iran amid mounting concern about Tehran's
nuclear enrichment programme, the Guardian has learned.
The Ministry of Defence believes the US may decide to fast-forward plans
for targeted missile strikes at some key Iranian facilities. British
officials say that if Washington presses ahead it will seek, and
receive, UK military help for any mission, despite some deep
reservations within the coalition government.
In
anticipation of a potential attack, British military planners are
examining where best to deploy Royal Navy ships and submarines equipped
with Tomahawk cruise missiles over the coming months as part of what
would be an air and sea campaign.
They
also believe the US would ask permission to launch attacks from Diego
Garcia, the British Indian ocean territory, which the Americans have
used previously for conflicts in the Middle East.
The
Guardian has spoken to a number of Whitehall and defence officials over
recent weeks who said Iran was once again becoming the focus of
diplomatic concern after the revolution in Libya.
They
made clear that Barack Obama, has no wish to embark on a new and
provocative military venture before next November's presidential
election.
But
they warned the calculations could change because of mounting anxiety
over intelligence gathered by western agencies, and the more belligerent
posture that Iran appears to have been taking.
As
I mentioned yesterday, the current leadership of the IAEA is far more
suspicious of Iranian intentions than the former chairman and Nobel
Prize winner Muhammad ElBaradei. Any new information is likely to come
in the warhead design area or missile modifications - a sure sign that
Iran is close, or already possesses, the means to make a bomb.
Obama
might see an Iran attack as just the ticket to win re-election so don't
count on his indecision to use force. He hasn't backed down from
Pakistan, or Yemen in launching drone strikes or even missiles at
terrorist targets. As long as American forces won't be exposed to
casualties, he may see an Iran attack as a cheap way to score commander
in chief points with the voters.